Firearms Is My Second Favorite F-Word Shirt, hoodie, tank top
Buy this product here: Firearms Is My Second Favorite F-Word Shirt, hoodie, tank top
Home page: Beutee Store
Firearms Is My Second Favorite F-Word Shirt, hoodie, tank top
Well seriously though, a stop motion camera positioned at a guard/check point that fails to capture high speed motion?What good would this type of antiquated technology be if a bomb ladened truck were to crash through the post?The truck MIGHT be seen, if it were captured in the right frame.
Sorry for the BOLD, but America's being fooled.
I'm not saying or suggesting that the government fixed the evidence to go around the story, or anything.Who would ever get the crazy notion to fix evidence, facts around a story?
What I'm asking and attempting to point out is, that with this official re release of the exact same stop motion video, that has already been pointed out, exists on the Internets, that the re release doesn't answer questions, it begs for further questions to be asked.
America can not accept the line that the Government has sold us on this.
Again, I ask.
FOR A GOVERNMENT THAT IS SO TECHNOLOGICALLY ADVANCED, BOTH IN IT'S CIVILIAN SECTOR AND IN IT'S PRIVATE AND MILITARY SECTORS, IS THIS GRAINY, STOP MOTION CAMERA THE BEST THAT OUR GOVERNMENT'S MONEY CAN BUY?
Remember, this is camera work from the property of the US Government.NOT the security video from the convenience store.
COMMENT #325 [Permalink]... Agent99 said on 5/17/2006 @ 4:57 pm PT...
The cameras are only set to detect things moving at ground speeds, and shoot in conservation mode. The Pentagon is protected by its own anti-aircraft weapons, NORAD, radar, etc. NOTHING can get near, nothing can even get on their heading from many miles away, without them knowing. So there is NO need to have more sophisticated surveillance cameras by the security gates. This is NOT new insofar as 4 or 5 frames were previously released; it IS new insofar as it gives you the whole pertinent footage from two cameras, and we are better able to tell for sure what the footage says and does not say. It unequivocally backs up the impact zone's assertion that it wasn't a 757 that hit the Pentagon. And I am actually a little surprised the jerks would let it out to add more fuel to our fire. I'm assuming people are still after the gas station and other surveillance cameras' footage.... Maybe we'll get it. Probably not.
Visit our Social Network: Beutee Pinterest, Instagram, Twitter and Our blog Beutee over-blog, beuteenet blogspot
Comments
Post a Comment